Young nude girls
Tuesday, 8 February 2005
This is a sort of mental spam trap. There are no nude girls here. Well, there are a couple here but none on this site. Well, if pressed, yowser!, one must admit there are pieces of a few here and here. If you don’t know how to use Google’s image search to find porn, you deserve this kind of sidetracking.
No underage nudes, only information about your general hunger for them. So if you’re here to find skin, you’ll only find your own, flapping on the fence post. Pow, whatcha gonna do now?
The graphs and data below come from searches referring visitors to Sedition·com in the past 18 months. If you’re curious to see some searches that bring people here as they happen, here is the referring searches page; enjoy the fruitless debauchery.
That’s right, you’re looking for naked girls about 13 years of age. Boy, that’s charming. I had a hunch it would bell-out there and I was right. Here are some more lies, I mean statistics. To think I got my first $15,000 raise for doing this same sort of stuff at Amazon.com where my audience was also not listening.
mean -->> 14.07
median -->> 13.00
standard_deviation -->> 5.49There were tiny statistical spikes at 40 and 65 but they didn’t even reach the size of age groups like 4 and 5, and they’re not revolting, so they’re left out of the graphs.
The more you know: child pornography
As a public service, I’d like to remind the viewers at home that:
- Underage porn, even the softest-core, and they are oh, so soft at that age, will land you in the big house (not to be confused with the monkey house, aka 1600 Pennsylvania Ave).
- Many browsers keep a history of where you go, what you search for, and even what you type. And other persons’ webservers, like mine, record the same information by your IP which is usually traceable back to you.
- If none of the above has sunk in, I’ll spell it out. If you actually manage to find underage nude girls online, which you probably won’t, prison is just one dime-drop away for as long as the statute of limitations in your state lasts, i.e. years.
The numbers
Selected levels of national perversion in ascending magnitude of collective deviance.
6 Sweden
6 Russian Federation
6 Romania
7 United Arab Emirates
7 Pakistan
7 Brazil
8 Croatia
11 Netherlands
11 New Zealand
12 European Union
18 Belgium
32 South Africa
70 Israel
87 Australia
116 Canada
129 India
204 United Kingdom
248 Germany
484 indeterminate
1,450 United States
As usual, America retains its clear dominance in a field that is pathetic, perverted, and sad.
Update, 21 June 2007
There is a less ironic explication of sorts here–Viewer mail: underage pornography.
Discussion
Comments
Re: Young nude girls
hi i agree i heard that there are p2p cilents like ares that have child pornography and lots of it and torture rape and more i hope it is shut dwn its horrible and theres nudism sites like purenudism.com that features illegal pics and videos
By cory on 10 June 2007 · 18:55
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Your site kicks ass. I was looking for "random naked girl" just to see what was around. Your site is way more interesting than just a random naked girl!
By Sam Erican on 28 July 2007 · 19:45
comment link · reply to this
wow
nice site!¡!
By wow on 31 August 2007 · 13:36
comment link · reply to this
hiiiiiiiiii
hi
By maged on 4 October 2008 · 08:36
comment link · reply to this
funny site
This site is awesome, Wow I have to show it to everyone, :) I wonder if it is bad that there is thousands of views shown and only three other comments? Good luck with all of this, I may be a fan of porn but there is a limit.
By Josh on 1 September 2007 · 01:29
comment link · reply to this
Re: funny site
Thanks. There have been, I think, well over a million views of just this page at this point. The comments part of the site is a pretty recent addition though. I’ve got a bit of email for it in the past. I can think of several reasons someone wouldn’t want to comment on this one in particular including that anonymous comments don’t post.
By Ashley on 1 September 2007 · 09:19
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
The follow-up post is indispensable for an understanding and putting context to this one. The exploitation of children and the exploitation of moral panic are symbiotic -- two sides of the same coin and often enough the same people.
One way of interpreting the results would be pointing an accusing finger at the Leviticans' agenda of enforced ignorance and infantilization of the American public. They are also, by far, the worst offenders.
By Don Esquilo on 2 September 2007 · 11:56
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
You could not be more right if I had written that for you. :)
See also.
By Ashley on 2 September 2007 · 12:37
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Please do not see my arguments as in favour of what you are against. But you should put more reason into your arguments and attitude. People in first world countries live in societies mostly situated within huge developed and nice urban areas. These educated people has societies that were transformed by a mass media linked life style that generalised facts and phenomena on a huge scale - actually distorting human emotional instinct formed over a 100 000 years still being observed in societies living in the rain forest. These modern societies have judicial systems that generalise aspects of social pathology to include a wide range of actions regarded as undesirable for a range of reasons. This situation then distort situations that must actually be regarded as natural. In my country there is a huge problem of teenage girls getting themselves pregnant to escape pressures of school etc. and to qualify for a goverment allowance. When people discuss this sitaution they talk about the girls of 15 becoming pregnant as an unatural phenomena. It is not. It is the most natural thing in te world for a 15 year old female to become pregnant. It is only in the last 100 years or so that for the majority of our people a beginning was made to see the social and economic and personal advantages of delaying marriage and pregnancy, etc. Your statistics actually reflect a natural phenomena - call it what you like -bad, or perversion etc.but it is still natural and 2000 years ago all girls between 12 - 14 years engaged in marraige, sex, etc. Girls living in basic societies within the rain forst still become pregnant shortly after 12 years of age, etc. In modern societies the sexualisation of children is tragic, but your statistics regarding the 12- 14 year olds look pretty natural to me for male beings whose very first sexual focus in their lives were on females of this age group over a time span of 100 000 years. These are not pedophiles and to include pedophiles within this male interest into young females will weaken actions agains real pedophiles which are a real danger to societies everywhere. The emotional interest into virgins (traditionally of this age group an not the nowadays concept) - has most probably more to do about genes - is still relavant - only now boys and girls of 12 years of age are not suppose to engage in sex - which is a good thing of course for modern societies. But to actually get some truth in your viewpoints you must start calling it something else, or focus on reality. You cannot generalise this much and hope to make a dent in the phenomena. Add to your arguments and focus on the actual children. You cannot put a 5 year old and 11 year old in the same category and hope to influence a world wide society.
The Statistics - Nude girls by age- for 12 - 14 year olds are actually natural and correct - if unwanted.
By do not over generalise on 7 September 2007 · 02:57
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
DNOG, I suspect that your comment is a drive-by and that you didn't take the time the read the follow up post -- which is linked for convenience at the end of this one and is explicitly recommended for further understanding. If you had, you mightn't be so quick to tell Ashley to use more reason.
By Don Esquilo on 7 September 2007 · 13:28
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
As Scruggs noted—I am really not making an argument, just a little name calling, really—the real arguments were presented in the follow-up.
Some things I will mention about your points: while it was natural for 13-16 year-olds to be become pregnant in days gone by, it was also natural for them to wed; often an older man who could at least provide for them somewhat. It’s not now. Instead tax money provides for them and their lives are all but over since few have what it takes to be a single mom while finishing high-school and doing anything at all in life. It was also natural, and still is in many places, to kill or disown the baby or the girl.
From a naturalist argument, which you’re using, we must assume the disgusting position of “old enough to bleed, old enough to breed.” Higher fat diets have pushed menses back from 16 for some girls to the 6-8 range. While at the same time, progress has pushed mental maturity backwards too. Many 10 year-olds could run a homestead in the farming/framing era. Most 10 year-olds now are utterly incompetent at every skill necessary to survive outside modern human society. Bad combination. Kids who are less equipped for everything but physically ready much earlier.
So, again, referring to the follow-up, I agree it is natural, normal and for some age groups, probably completely healthy. I also know you can’t make generalizations and some 16 year-old women are more able to handle sexuality than some 25 year-old girls. I’ll sum up with–
really young nude
By Ashley on 8 September 2007 · 12:10
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
I find this funny, how can guys actually really want to look at little kids. I am married and that is all I need. I mean come on, if you are that desperate to go searching for little kids online, than you have got to be one sick minded pathetic person.... right?
By Stephen Bird on 15 September 2007 · 21:56
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
Small comment for you Steven Bird. If you are married and have kids, and disgusted by pedophiles, then how did you end up at this site?
By Doughboy on 22 October 2007 · 18:04
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
woah this site is intresting i waa looking for random nude girls and this came up and damn i love this site!!
By bugdann on 15 October 2007 · 21:07
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
This site truly is quite interesting. I am currently volunteering for a branch of the CPA (Child Protection Agency) that deals with online exploitation of children. You can always tell the true pedophiles...they make their way here(or similar "bunk" red flagging sites) and realize that their IP has been tagged by the webserver, they then write some story of how they arrived (i.e. searching for random nude). We all know that this is a lie. They just want to cover up for their mistake. My message goes out to all the pedophiles. WE ARE WATCHING! You may think you are getting away with what you watch on the internet. The truth is, once you goto a "red flag" site your IP is stored. The lists of potential pedophiles is gigantic none the less. That is more than likely why you have not been prosecuted yet. Believe me, you are on the list. It is only a matter of time before the law will catch up to you. My advice...stop looking at porn all together. The human mind has what is called an arousal pallette. When you watch porn on the internet your pallette expands. Soon you need more and more exotic porn to arouse you. This is a very dangerous thing to mess with. For all those real pedophiles out there you should check this site out (Before it is too late!) http://www.way2hope.org/pedophile_therapy.htm
By Doughboy on 22 October 2007 · 17:47
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
Hi this is for Mr. CPC up there, i as you said I didnt get here by any mistake,I'm 22 years old and I was looking for 15 or 16 year old girls, not that i like young girls just the young body type, a 30 or 40year old woman with a teeny body type and a young looking face would be just as good , but thats beside the point i came here to tell you that anyone who knows anything about computers knows that you sound just like a jackass because IP#s can be changed and very easily at that, and although most dumbasses aren't smart enough to do it and I'm certainly not going to break it down for them so it may result in some arrests, that is not by far the best way to catch people in the act, What you need to do (and if your really CPC and you really work to save children I'm sure you can get clearance for this because the police do it all the time) is to hire a professional hacker, and once you capture the IP# go into that persons computer and find out what they have downloaded and saved on there hard drive, then no investigation would be necessary, if they had illegal shit rush there house and bust there ass if not then save the IP sense there probably old guys who aren't smart enough to change it and check back later,.....
I'm just saying that IP tracking is good and all but if your gonna fight child pornography at least do all you can to prevent it and not just some pussy browser tracking shit
By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:11
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Say what? Doughboy dude, you're mostly incoherent, what little of your "theory" can be understood is junk psychology, your attack on Steve is bizarre and you're spamming for a commercial site. Moreover, a claimed affiliation with Child Protective Services gives no authority at all to your comments. Those agencies are among the very worst abusers of children. They attract disturbed people.
By Don Esquilo on 22 October 2007 · 21:11
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
those statistics about what age people search for is crap. Your average person simply looking for porn is not going to specify "18 year old girls", he doesnt need to, most porn feature girls of legal age, meanwhile the perverts that are looking for younger girls have to specify... THe only reason the number is highest at 13 is because no one is looking for 17, or even 16 year old girls because they simply look like many 18 y.o.s and visa versa, meanwhile 15 and 14, things get different, and 13 is where it becomes completely perverted. im not saying that it isnt wrong, but as a statistics student, I can tell you that the whole thing is crap.
By tsmith on 16 November 2007 · 16:35
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
Well, I believe you. You sound like a statistics student: you don’t know how to read or spell. Speaking as someone who long since finished school a good student in every subject, you’re just upset b/c you got stung. Read the follow up—Viewer mail: underage pornography—if you want the real treatment. Read a lot more literature if you want to better understand what you read going forward in life.
Here is a selection of current queries, just ’cause we’re on the topic–
And since those are current, right now, for visitors who were just on this page… ah, well, you know the punchline already, right?
By Ashley on 16 November 2007 · 18:35
comment link · reply to this
Re^3: Young nude girls
I agree with you that child porn is evil. I am a dad of an 8 yr old. I started to do some research on this and think I can write a book about this. I used to write and haven't in some while. If I could get it published - it could educate people as to what is on the internet. Since you have done so much research on this - maybe you can provide stats for me. I started with searching the web for over 18 yrs old sites. Of course all this stuff is legal but they use models that suggest underage kids. It's disgusting. Then I searched for stuff that was underage but non-nude. I know I can't go into the really dirty stuff - and I wouldn't want to because it would literally make me sick. But how can I learn what is on these sites without going there? Is there a forum like yours? Appreciate all help you can give and any advice.
By anthony rago on 6 January 2008 · 22:04
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
My original comment expired since I didn't find the time to respond to e-mail. basically the comment was you are a weird MF if you think any CP freak would worry about your site. By my next comment still stands.Yes even I sometimes find myself attempting to converse with a buffoon. Not unlike those who talk to their pets all the while knowing that said pet is an animal and does not have the capacity to understand human language. According to your theory, while the viewing of a rose might be acceptable as long you and your ilk are given the power of censorship the viewing of a rose bud should be a criminal offense. Also according to garden variety idiots such as yourself, since the viewing of the rose bud makes you want to fondle yourself that it must affect all others the same way. If that not be the case then the highly objectionable truth must be faced, which is that your witch hunt for the pervert you seek was over when you first placed your hands to the keyboard. "Non doth proclaim innocence so loudly as the guilty." The twisted mind does exist. More so in cyber space? No the twist was there before the connection was made. No doubt some will accept your fabricated statistical data as truth. I am sure it does have a certain amount of value since it is based on your own search results. All it tells me for sure is that you are seeking the company of those such as yourself that have a propensity for 13 year olds. "Seek and you shall find" . If you get lost in your wanderings the following info may help you find your way back.
Domain name: SEDITION.COM
Registrant Contact:
Ashley Pond V
Ashley Pond (webmaster@sedition.com)
+1.2066247178
PO Box 2070
El Prado, NM 87529
US
That explains much. El Prado NM outside of Taos the community originally built by the old Hippies now supported by Drug and Alcohol Rehab Clinics.
IP Address 208.97.130.64
OrgName: New Dream Network, LLC
OrgID: NDN
Address: 417 Associated Rd
Address: PMB #257
City: Brea
StateProv: CA
PostalCode: 92821
Country: US
NetRange: 208.97.128.0 - 208.97.191.255
CIDR: 208.97.128.0/18
NetName: DREAMHOST-BLK5
NetHandle: NET-208-97-128-0-1
Parent: NET-208-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS1.DREAMHOST.COM
NameServer: NS2.DREAMHOST.COM
NameServer: NS3.DREAMHOST.COM
OrgAbuseHandle: DAT5-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: DreamHost Abuse Team
OrgAbusePhone: +1-714-706-4182
OrgAbuseEmail: abuse@dreamhost.com
OrgNOCHandle: ZD69-ARIN
OrgNOCName: Network Operations
OrgNOCPhone: +1-714-706-4182
OrgNOCEmail: netops@dreamhost.com
OrgTechHandle: ZD69-ARIN
OrgTechName: Network Operations
OrgTechPhone: +1-714-706-4182
OrgTechEmail: netops@dreamhost.com
OrgTechHandle: MNA47-ARIN
OrgTechName: Nagel, Mark
OrgTechPhone: +1-949-279-5817
OrgTechEmail: mnagel@willingminds.com
By Ric on 18 November 2007 · 07:50
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
You’re right… I’m so embarrassed. I can only hope that someday I’ll be as good at all this as you are.
Why, I think I’m crying a little. To imagine that someone with your insight and deep reading comprehension could see so clearly to the root of my soul through a single piece of satire. It’s almost as if you intuited the entire follow-up.
Such valuable feedback… I’m doubly embarrassed that I haven’t paid for it. Surely you’re a famous psychiatrist in real life. I must owe you a couple hundred dollars at least.
I must take issue with the Taos remark however. It was a Spanish town 300 years before the sixties and a Tiwa town for 500 years previous to that neighborhood extension. Some few Anglos did make the scene before the advent of free love as well.
And I hate to mention it but since we’re friends now, I guess I should. I really appreciate you taking the time to write again after you came down off your high. Your spelling, grammar, and ability to click a link in an email confirmation improved drastically from your first attempt.
Thanks also for letting me know that they are referred to as “CP freaks.” I’ve learned so much today.
By Ashley on 18 November 2007 · 10:54
comment link · reply to this
Re^3: Young nude girls
LOL not to be funny here man , but while you were ragging on homeboys spelling check out this line from you own feedback
"I don't do CP but obiviously u are loking 4 those that do."
notice anything wrong??? I was LOKING for that too but i never found it.......lol
By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:27
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Dr. Pond! I see you've managed to locate my patient. The pleismograph results and the burdillo tend to upset them, poor things. But they never go very far. I suspect they know that the treatment is ultimately the ideal resolution for what ails them.
By Don Esquilo on 19 November 2007 · 15:21
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
This is a condescending piece of worthless crap --- My entry was aimed precisely at locating countries where young girl pornography occurs. Your listing is deceptive in that EVERY household in the United States has a computer and internet access. The other countries you list clearly do not! Like the shitty media, your information is slanted from the outset. Please make a chart indicating the names of the COUNTRIES THAT CONDONE CHILD PORNO as an industry, and there you have an interesting statistic. I dont fear Americans - I am an American - I fear data smearing, tainted crap head media types who think America is bad and HIllary Clinton is great!! A photo of Hillary? Now thats pornographic based on the malfeasance she has never resolved beyond a shadow of doubt! Back to your condescending webpage; The Attitude that an image of freshly bathed new born child being towel dried in the loving arms of his or her mother is considered pornographic or sick -- THAT ATTITUDE IS TRULY PORNOGRAPHIC (sic) and generally, it is an American point of view. If you fear Americans as you say you do under your masthead then leave! Go to France or Mexico and take few illegals with you while you are at it!
By joejoe on 14 December 2007 · 12:11
comment link · reply to this
Joey Joe-Joe Junior Shabadoo
Though it’s listed quite clearly—and the lack of statistical soundness is even mentioned above—here you go again: Viewer mail: underage pornography.
At your age being stupid is a choice, not a product of your environment and upbringing. The quote was a song lyric, randomly chosen. The picture was a political ad, randomly served by Google. The various other errors in context and fact are left as an exercise for the reader. Maybe take the day to look down the rails of your life to the vanishing point at the horizon. You still have time to head that shit off, man.
Also, Thailand, Italy, and Korea.
By Ashley on 14 December 2007 · 12:25
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Bravo!!!! Well played!!!! This thread is rather interesting. I think I'll have to follow up on it and see where it goes.
By Andrew on 20 January 2008 · 05:34
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Do you have the power and the means to shutdown sites that have child porn?
If so I would like to help.
I have a daughter that is 13 and the thought that anyone would look at her in the wrong way really angers me.
A friend of mine told me about this site. So I read what you said about not being able to find any sites online. I searched and it did take about 2 hours but once I found one they started popping up everywhere.
If I sent you the addresses can you shut them down or know someone who can?
By Apaleador on 20 January 2008 · 21:45
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
I don’t have any personal power to shut down sites. The good news is, if you find a site that has actual underage pornography on it, all you have to do is write their host company, registrar, and tell the local cops; if they won’t listen, some of the stuff falls in the purview of the FBI; call them.
The problem is defining child porn. I was looking through this site’s ranks on a site tracker last week and it showed “related sites.” I clicked through a couple and found little girls (5-10 year-olds) in provocative poses and skimpy clothing. That’s not porn technically so it would be hard to shut it down but it’s obviously published for sexual gratification. Nauseating. I don’t personally blame the publishers as much as the parents. What kind of person let’s their kid do that? Even the ostensibly legal stuff?
But 13… By historical and biological standards that’s a woman. The age of consent in a couple of states was that or lower when I was that age. I don’t know if that’s still true. For your daughter, focus on support and education. The world is gonna see what it sees; in all its f’ed up glory. She’s the one who is going have to decide what it means and have the skills and strength to make it stick.
By Ashley on 21 January 2008 · 20:09
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
I found a website called ACPO (Anti-child Porn Organization). You can report the URL of the site there and they investigate it and notify the proper authorities to deal with it.
Hopefully, this will help close them down. I was able to report 20 sites, but a lot of them were interconnected with each other. The sites didn't send you to any galleries, just other sites with thumbnails.
If you click on a thumbnail it sent you to another site with thumbnails. Even though there weren't any galleries the thumbnails were bad enough and need to be deleted from the web.
By Apaleador on 25 January 2008 · 16:53
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Ok.. Well, I have to admit that most of this is very true in many ways and that some people that hit your site will try to say something else, try this one on.. I was (and I mean that in all ways) convicted of downloading CP many years ago and did time for it. I am not saying that because I am proud, I am saying it because it is true and that it can happen no matter what someone tries to do to hide it. The reason I came to this site was not while searching for porn however. A friend gave me the address for it because he found it while searching for porn (i did however slap him across the back of the head for it) I wanted to check it out due to what i went to prison for and find that you did your homework and that the intelligent people are making valid posts and points and the idiots (for lack of a better word) are just that due to they cant seem to grasp what you and your site are doing in the information field. I say Kudos to you and to the rest of the people in here actually giving good responses and from someone who has been there, I am glad for it. I have 2 little boys of my own now and trust me, its not something you would like to see happen to your own (unless you are one of the ones that does that in the first place.. and you know who you are)
By Grantomas on 26 February 2008 · 23:03
comment link · reply to this
Thanks
Thanks. This site is very useful - I was searching information about child porn (and pedophiles) for school project (Project about dangers and traps on the internet for young, unmature people...).
But this numbers are just...terrifying...However i think, that lots of those searches are from "horny" 13 year old boys - in that age, whebn puberty starts, they ussually starts to "look" on girls...
(Sorry for not-good english, I am writing a bit faster than i would like to.)
By dracek on 5 April 2008 · 01:25
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
sexy young virgin hot girl
By lakitha on 9 April 2008 · 01:03
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Very interesting subject indeed. After reading some of the posts here, I have come to my own conclusion. It's human to be devious. You can argue with me, but prove me wrong, you will not. Though this website seems to want to help many sick people or help the ignorant become aware of a terrible subject... the truth is simple. You have nothing better to do. It's a dog eat dog world. Everyone has a sin/flaw. I'm sure you knew/know that. Don't contradict me, we both know I'm right.
By Dave R on 12 April 2008 · 13:25
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
What’s this “we,” white man?
Stick to stuff at your comprehension level and it will all seem less devious.
By Ashley on 13 April 2008 · 10:52
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
how are sites like pure nudism legal..saw a comment above and checked it out...its ridiculous how they can try to offer memberships for a site that has ridiculously illegal crap on there...
By jay984 on 28 April 2008 · 23:42
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Well isn't this a long thread. It is interesting to see how many people get defensive over such a simple bit of information which admittedly is flawed but has a very valid core. Still, as I'm probably about to say some very offensive things myself, let us clear the air. I ended up here by searching for information on the legality of nudists posting pictures of their underage children. Which reminds me, I'll be checking back at this site for responses, and I'm still rather curious about that topic. I believe that a person could not get into trouble with it due to the fact that it is not sexual in nature. I also believe that people will and do misuse this in order for sexual gratification. Oh yes, and for those of you wishing to pass yourselves off as officers of Child Protective Services: A) CPS is one of the most mislead and disgusting organizations on the planet. They are answerable only to themselves in any reasonable manner, and should have been disbanded years ago in favor of more logical and controlled systems. B) IF you actually ARE an officer of CPS, then one must wonder how it is that you yourself came to this site. C) Since the odds are extremely against you being a CPS officer: The act of impersonating a federal or state authority is a crime. In every state of the fucked up nation called the United States of America you can be arrested, tried, and imprisoned for that act. I sincerely hope you're from the United States, by the way, because lately I need a good laugh. Now then, on to topics more relevant to the commentary in this thread. First of all, to you panicking paedophiles who have ended up here. You're sick. But calm down. There are thousands of ways to end up on a particular site (This one for example) and the majority of them are legal. Seek help though. Seriously. To those of you who are legitimately ranting and raving at the people stating that 13 is a natural age to breed: Calm down. First of all, it's a valid viewpoint if you look at the evolution of the human species. We were designed to go sexually active near that age. Now mind you, I say this despite the fact that I have a daughter, and a little girl whom I consider my sister (My mother's best friends daughter) and I will personally and cheerfully kill anyone who thought of molesting either of them. So why do I say that it is a valid viewpoint? Because we are hardwired that way. It is a disgusting fact of evolution that the mammalian brain is geared to want to jump any valid member of the opposite sex as soon as they are entering sexual maturity. However in todays day and age, I fervently wish that our unique propensity for logic would override this, however that is not the case in some individuals.
To those of you supporting the viewpoint that it is a normal situation to want to view and/or mate with individuals of the above mentioned age groups: Also consider that despite our instincts, and despite our occasional lack of knowledge, we have managed to overcome most of our basic instincts through ordered logic and the enforcement of the law. Also to be considered is that is the fact that with maturity should come the innate ability to override our base desires in favor of self preservation. As a George Carlin once stated "Survival comes before fucking". Paedophilia is not a great way to survive as a good number of paedophiles die either before making it to prison, or during their sentence. Usually by the hands of other individuals whom are unable to overcome their base instincts. Now for the site author. I disagree with very little of the content of your site, despite the fact that you have not done proper research on the topic that you have chosen to lambast visitors about. However, the main item with which I take issue is the statement, 'What's this "we," white man?". This statement provoked me to bother commenting for three reasons: 1) Why would you post a blatantly racist, and clearly ignorant comment on your page while attempting to enlighten the masses regarding an issue that you clearly care about? 2) Assuming that you are of non-Caucasian origins, another possible explanation is that you believe that the 'white man' owes you something due to past transgressions. Let me say this clearly: I have never owned a slave. I have never 'stolen' land (By the way, a poor business deal does not necessarily mean theft), and I have never put any person in a containment camp. Spew your bile elsewhere if this is the case, because most of us are tired of it. Racism is ignorance, plain and simple and regardless of where it is directed. 3) I will assume here that your comment was/is directed at Dave R, since it directly follows it. With that assumption in mind, I would like to point out that he did not identify himself as being of Caucasian decent. He also made a valid point that humans have flaws. That is an immutable fact. Despite my opinion on his post I must concede that point. You however, instead of taking an approach such as pointing out that humans can control and overcome their flaws through discipline and understanding, chose to exhibit your own flaw by spewing racism in his general direction. Given your choice of phrasing, I assume that you are what people like to call 'Native American'? Well, I was born here, so that makes me about as native as anyone else born here, despite my Irish ancestry. With that out of the way, Dave R, yes it is human to be devious, however; the clear fact of the matter is that it is also human to strive for constant improvement of ourselves. It is also human to desire to protect those who cannot or will not protect themselves from those who believe 'It's a dog eat dog world.', and who believe that sentiment gives them the right to abuse, deride, and otherwise demean another human being. Being an American I firmly believe in our basic human rights, such as freedom of speech. If Ms. Pond wishes to spend her time designing, building, and maintaining a trap site, then who are you to speak ill of her? What have you spent your time doing? Insulting someone who you think has 'nothing better to do'. IF that is the case, then tell me, why would you wish to demean this endeavour? Why would you wish to deride her for the pastime she has chosen for herself? And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye? - Matthew 7:3 Forgive the bible reference. I'm not Christian, but it seemed to be the most fitting rebuke.
By Why give a name on 10 May 2008 · 14:07
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
I can appreciate the sentiments but that’s actually the punchline to a joke—not some sort of mini-racist diatribe—in response to this–
I’m actually so white that I don’t consider the Irish to be. Too many Celts in the woodpile.
Now, that’s called satire, irony, sarcasm, facetiousness, and so on in some circles. I concede it is not always readily identifiable in snippets. You see the problem though. It’s funny if you get it. It’s not funny if you explain it. If I’d stopped with that line, this comment would have been amusing. Now, it’s not. Of course there are fewer misunderstandings when one bothers to read the materials presented and referenced repeatedly: Viewer mail: underage pornography.
So… given the choice between amusing readers who have both a sense of humor and the means to apply it or angering some who don’t read deeply or widely or perhaps are generally unhappy and can see only more unhappiness in any potentially ambiguous situation or text, I’ll take Manhattan. Got change for a $50?
PS–
This is one article out of approximately 5,000 pages on Sedition·com and Ms Pond also works on and contributes to other sites. She is the hardest working woman on the Internet and I’m sure she’d resent the implication that this bit of fluff and log parsing constituted more than an hour of her time in the ten years this site has been in operation.
By Ashley on 10 May 2008 · 15:13
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
你们好，我是中国人~说实话，我英语很烂，所以希望有会中文的朋友看到，我喜欢小女孩，但我在你们外国的网站找不到关于小女孩的裸体图，是小女孩而不是16，17的。麻烦有知道网址的朋友告诉我，thanks!
By 刘 on 14 June 2008 · 00:55
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
Dude I came here cause I'm a perverted 13 yr boy looking for 13 yr old porn and I know I'll find it somewhere on the interenet.
By 13 years on 19 July 2008 · 23:39
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
what a load of BS, i know for a fact from my own experience that any 13 year old boy who happened to stumble upon this site would not only be scared shitless that there mommy would find out they were searching for porn, they would most likely be too intimidated by the long process of leaving a comment and the fear of being tracked down by the cops to even thing about accually going through with leaving the comment.
This is the kind of asshole who needs to be hacked to find out just whats on his hard drive,
because we all know a 13 year old boy would run away from this site in a heartbeat as soon as knew there was a chance of being in trouble
By Mr Happy on 21 July 2008 · 00:39
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
I found this site after finding purenudism.com. I did a search for that URL and the word "illegal" and popped up here since one of the comments had also mentioned the name of that website.
The statistics are pretty interesting.
But I am wondering.. I don't know if I reported purenudism before, but I know I reported a similar website that had a few pictures that were also on the purenudism site. How can it be legal for that website to not only have those pictures, but to SELL DVD videos of their teen junior beauty contests? The website says it includes nudes at all ages, but it also said it is legal. How does that work?
And for the person that commented way below me about only pedophiles finding this type of stuff.. I found the website that I found by doing a google search for NUDISTS.. Not everyone that stumbles upon that crap (or this website, for that matter) is here for disgusting purposes.
By Karla on 22 July 2008 · 08:29
comment link · reply to this
Re^2: Young nude girls
Hi, to the person just above wondering about the legality of purenudism.com,.. I am 22 years old, however do to my stupid adolescent years and talking shit to a girl that worked for the local gas station when i was 14, I was forced to take a class for sexual predators when i was 16 years old, and because of it I know most of the laws for this sort of thing
I mentioned this a little way up the list as well to reply to someone else who was confused,
Heres the thing = purenudism.com is legal because of one reason, and that reason is that the people in the pics and videos aren't doing anything sexual, They are simply carrying on there normal lives and so are there children, and since they are on a nudist ranch the pics and video are considered in the laws eyes to be no different then any other family pictures or home video that you or I might have
and I also mentioned before that it's almost a waste to report these sites because of the fact that they are on a nudist camp and the children are doing normal kid stuff, this gives them the excuse that they are simply proud parents sharing family pics and home movies, so that even if it was illegal it would be a violation of there rights to prosecute them
hope this helps you out,
and in case your wondering about the incident when i was 14 and how i came about having to take a sexual predators class,
I am ashamed but not afraid to say what it was, My friends and I would hang out alot of times at the gas station, no one cared and we were even friends with some of the employs and would chill with them when they went on break, until this new girl (who by the way was 20 years old) started working there, she made a huge fuss about us hanging out there and came out to get in our faces, as she was screaming in our faces cursing us out, I cut her off and said, and I quote "you need to go back in before i rape your ass" , She reported me to the cops for threatening to rape her and long story short I spent a year in a group home and when i got out I had to take the class for sexual predators as a punishment
So if you were trying to pass judgement please know that i never had and never will have any thoughts about young children, the offense i was in trouble for was against a girl who was more than 5 years older than me, and i had no in intention of going through with it, it was simply a strikeback because she was cursing and yelling in our faces
By Mr Happy on 25 August 2008 · 22:51
comment link · reply to this
Re: Young nude girls
this site is awesome. 2 thumbs up.
By y8ycgl on 4 October 2008 · 01:13
comment link · reply to this